Self-plagiarism occurs when you reuse your own previously submitted or published work — or substantial portions of it — without disclosure or proper citation. While it may seem contradictory to "plagiarize yourself," the issue is one of deception: you are presenting old work as new, original content. In academic settings, each assignment is expected to represent fresh intellectual effort.
Common forms include submitting the same paper to two different courses, recycling sections of a previous essay into a new one, and republishing previously published research without citing the earlier version. Self-plagiarism also extends to the professional world — publishing the same article in multiple journals (duplicate publication) or reusing substantial portions of grant proposals without disclosure.
Academic institutions take self-plagiarism seriously because it violates the expectation that submitted work represents original effort for the specific assignment. When a student submits the same paper to two courses, they receive credit twice for a single piece of work. This undermines the educational purpose of assignments and gives the self-plagiarizing student an unfair advantage over classmates who complete each assignment independently.
In research and publishing, self-plagiarism distorts the scholarly record. Duplicate publication inflates an author's apparent productivity, wastes editorial and peer-review resources, and misleads readers who may cite what they believe to be independent studies. Journals can retract papers found to contain significant self-plagiarism, damaging the researcher's reputation and career.
Most universities explicitly prohibit self-plagiarism in their academic integrity policies. Submitting work completed for one course to satisfy requirements in another — without prior written approval from both instructors — is typically treated as a violation. Penalties vary but can include failing the assignment, failing the course, or formal disciplinary proceedings.
Some institutions allow students to build upon their previous work with instructor permission, provided the new submission adds substantial original content and properly cites the earlier version. If you want to expand on a topic you have explored before, always consult your instructor first. Transparency about prior work is the key — the problem is not reusing ideas, but concealing the reuse.
Scholarly journals require that submitted manuscripts contain original, previously unpublished work. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously (simultaneous submission) or publishing substantially similar papers in different journals (duplicate publication) violates these policies. Many journals use plagiarism detection tools during peer review to check submissions against the existing literature, including the author's own published work.
Acceptable practices include publishing a brief conference paper and later expanding it into a full journal article (with proper disclosure), using data from a previous study in a new analysis, and writing a review article that summarizes your own and others' prior work. The common thread is transparency — always disclose the relationship to your earlier work and let editors make informed decisions.
The most effective prevention strategy is to treat each assignment or manuscript as a fresh project. Start from scratch rather than copying from your previous work. If you need to reference your own earlier ideas, cite your previous paper just as you would cite any other source. Use quotation marks for any text you reproduce verbatim and clearly indicate what is new versus what has been previously published.
Before submitting, ask yourself: "Have I submitted any part of this text before? Would my instructor or editor consider this original work?" If the answer is uncertain, disclose the situation to your instructor or editor proactively. Maintaining a personal record of all submissions helps you track which ideas and passages have been used previously, preventing accidental self-plagiarism.
Download a free demo or purchase a license to start checking for plagiarism and AI-generated content.
Detecting self-plagiarism requires comparing your current document against your own previous work. Plagiarism Detector's Local Folder check is ideal for this purpose — point it at a folder containing your previous papers and it will compare your new document against all of them, highlighting any overlapping passages. The Document Pair check allows you to directly compare two specific documents side by side.
For institutional use, the PDAS (Plagiarism Detector Accumulator Server) maintains a database of all previously submitted documents. When a new submission is checked against the PDAS database, any overlap with prior submissions — including the same student's earlier work — is flagged. This makes PDAS a powerful tool for universities and publishers to systematically detect self-plagiarism across large document collections.
Stand with Ukraine!